Hampshire played four matches this season, with the three SCCU ones and resumption of the annual match against Wiltshire. But the results were not great, with three losses in the SCCU, and a draw against Wiltshire meaning this was probably the worst season since their inception.
For the record of Hampshire County matches, and links to any articles I have written, the table on the Hampshire County Chess Matches page will detail these. The Hampshire County Chess History page summaries the leagues Hampshire have played in, and the successes Hampshire have achieved. Both of these are available from the menu at the top of the site as well.
Hampshire 6½ Sussex 9½ – 27 Sept 1902 – Portsmouth
Hampshire’s first match was against Sussex and was played in Portsmouth. Hampshire as reported in the Southern Echo (some bias) were slightly unlucky as one player (WG Kenny) defaulted, and another misunderstood the time limit, and lost on time when the position was in his favour.
I would say that the Hampshire team were understrength as looking at the team which beat Surrey the previous season they were missing T Crassweller, JE Haydon and WR Neve who played on boards 4 to 6. Hampshire winners were JH Blake, FJH Elwell, FA Joyce, KC Clayton and DHH Wassell.
Board | Hampshire | Club | Result | Sussex | Club | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JH Blake | Southampton | 1 | MR RG Reed | Brighton | 0 |
2 | FJH Elwell | Southampton | 1 | HH Cole | Hastings | 0 |
3 | Default | 0 | HW Shoosmith | Brighton | 1 | |
4 | E Draycott | Gosport | 0 | HE Dobell | Hastings | 1 |
5 | HD Osborn | Gosport | ½ | HW Butler | Brighton | ½ |
6 | FA Joyce | IOW | 1 | T Durant | Worthing | 0 |
7 | KC Clayton | Portsmouth | 1 | J Chandler | Lewes | 0 |
8 | G Wood | Portsmouth | 0 | Castle Leaver | Brighton | 1 |
9 | SD Caws | IOW | 0 | WR Andrews | Brighton | 1 |
10 | H Taggett | Southampton | 0 | GC Skyme | Hastings | 1 |
11 | F Martin | Portsmouth | 0 | FE Purchas | Brighton | 1 |
12 | L Hewett | IOW | ½ | J Creevy | Uckfield | ½ |
13 | DHH Wassell | Petersfield | 1 | F Brooke | 0 | |
14 | GH Barclay | Andover | ½ | FT Young | Brighton | ½ |
15 | W Tipper | Portsmouth | 0 | GM Norman | Brighton | 1 |
16 | HJ Penwill | Southampton | 0 | TG Mannington | Hastings | 1 |
Total | 6½ | Total | 9½ |
Hampshire 7 v Kent 9 – 22 Nov 1902 – London
The Kent match was played in London, and Hampshire missed a chances to repeat their win of the previous season losing 7 to 9. Their chances were not helped with two strong players missing, and more importantly two defaults. Board one JH Blake overstretched in pressing for the win, and lost against the strong OC Muller.
One thing which stood out was from the IOW Observer, which had the Hampshire clubs listed in their article, was that a number of the players were London based (5 of the 14). This probably made it easier for Hampshire to field a strong team in London, especially as the Kent match always seemed to be played there (unlike the Sussex and Surrey matches). But on the same hand it does seem that a number of the London players did not play in Southampton or Portsmouth, as if this was due to travelling or strength it is not clear. As these players seem to be playing in the middle boards, probably the former.
Hampshire winners were TE Haydon, JS Flower, CE Lloyd, GR Sloper, G Wood and GK Dupree.
The match was reported in the Portsmouth Evening News and Isle of Wight Observer with the Portsmouth Evening News mentioning Blake overpressing and the IOW Observer that Elwell and Draycott (board 2 and 4 in the Sussex match) were unavailable.
Board | Hampshire | Club | Result | Kent | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JH Blake | Southampton | 0 | OC Muller | 1 |
2 | E Seymour | London | 0 | EL Raymond | 1 |
3 | T Crassweller | London | 0 | HG Sturton | 1 |
4 | TE Haydon | London | 1 | G Chapman | 0 |
5 | WC Kenny | Southampton | 0 | E Creswell | 1 |
6 | FA Joyce | Newport | 0 | W Provis | 1 |
7 | WR Neve | London | ½ | GA Felce | ½ |
8 | E Clayton | Portsmouth | 0 | RI Jones | 1 |
9 | JS Flower | Ryde | 1 | Dixon | 0 |
10 | Default | 0 | JH Eastwood | 1 | |
11 | CE Lloyd | Leicester | 1 | OL Stevenson | 0 |
12 | GR Sloper | London | 1 | WM Brooke | 0 |
13 | G Wood | Portsmouth | 1 | Butler | 0 |
14 | DHH Wassell | Petersfield | ½ | AR Ropes | ½ |
15 | GK Dupree | Southampton | 1 | Revd WE Evill | 0 |
16 | Default | 0 | Whitman | 1 | |
Total | 7 | Total | 9 |
Hampshire 4½ v Surrey 11½ – 6 Dec 1902 – Southampton
Hampshire’s final SCCU opponent was Surrey, and as per the previous year Hampshire lost heavily (by the same score). Surrey would go on to with the SCCU Shannon Championship again this season, and it was not only Hampshire who last heavily to them. Surrey beat Kent, also by 11½ – 4½ in their match.
From the article in the Streatham News it can be seen that Surrey had brought a most impressive team to Southampton. On board one they had Herbert Jacobs whose EDO rating can be found here. It was also strange to see Joseph Blake on board two, if he was hoping to miss George Wainwright this did not happen, as he was playing behind Herbert Jacobs. After losing the last three county games Blake did manage to draw this game though.
TE Haydon took the top board for Hampshire, he normally played on board three of four and this may have been a tactical move? The final result is known, but there were four games to be adjudicated and therefore the individual results cannot be determined. Hampshire known winners were Dr RC MacDonald and FW Clarke.
Board | Hampshire | Result | Surrey | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TE Haydon | 0 | Herbert Jacobs | 1 |
2 | JH Blake | ½ | GE Wainwright | ½ |
3 | FJH Elwell | ½ | AJ Curnock | ½ |
4 | Dr RC Macdonald | 1 | AE Tietjen | 0 |
5 | WC Kenny | a | FL Anspach | a |
6 | E Draycott | 0 | TB Girdlestone | 1 |
7 | A Thomson | 0 | HS Barlow | 1 |
8 | E Clayton | a | Dr Dunstan | a |
9 | FW Clarke | 1 | LP Rees | 0 |
10 | G Wood | 0 | H Greenwell | 1 |
11 | WB George | 0 | AW Fisher | 1 |
12 | DHH Wassell | a | PJ Allingham | a |
13 | R Targett | a | WHP Pollock | a |
14 | GR Barton | 0 | HR Allingham | 1 |
15 | S Leonard | ½ | A Ashby | ½ |
16 | GJ Beer | 0 | M Shaw Stewart | 1 |
Total | 4½ | Total | 11½ |
Hampshire 9 v Wiltshire 9 – 16 July 1903 – Salisbury
Hampshire’s final match of the season was their friendly against Wiltshire. This was one of the rare occurrences where Hampshire failed to win this fixture, which ended in a draw. Hampshire were not bringing their full strength team to this match, as can be seen from the missing players, and the board number that players were on. For example A Thomson played on board 2 in this match, and board 7 in the Surrey one.
You may notice that F Martin played on board 17 in this match and board 11 in the Sussex match, but he was often used as a reserve, which is probably the case in the Sussex match. Good to see him on the correct board for his strength, and he did win his game.
Joining F Martin as Hampshire winners were JH Blake, EC Clarke, SD Caws, AG Ripley, E Atkins and RE Reade.
The match was reporting in the Wiltshire Times and Trowbridge Advertiser.
I am not sure if the Wiltshire club is really Sarum, more likely Salisbury, but the newspaper cutting did say S for Sarum and I have left like this for now. In addition it
Board | Hants | Club | Result | Wilts | Club | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JH Blake | Southampton | 1 | W McCrum | Sarum | 0 |
2 | A Thomson | Bournemouth | 0 | A Rumboll | 1 | |
3 | E Clayton | Portsmouth | 0 | Revd JTC Chatto | Swindon | 1 |
4 | EC Clarke | Portsmouth | 1 | Revd CJF Welsh | Warminster | 0 |
5 | RH Wadeson | Portsmouth | 0 | A Schomberg | Devizes | 1 |
6 | SD Caws | IOW – Cowes | 1 | F Sutton | Sarum | 0 |
7 | WJ Turner | Andover | 0 | W Bruges | Warminster | 1 |
8 | R Chipperfield | Southampton | ½ | HS May | Marl | ½ |
9 | A Watson | Southampton | 0 | E Fear Hill | Bradford | 1 |
10 | W Tipper | Portsmouth | 0 | JW Clark | Sarum | 1 |
11 | JB Elcum | Portsmouth | ½ | HW Beaven | Bradford | ½ |
12 | WF Sandell | Southampton | ½ | AR White | Mere | ½ |
13 | AG Ripley | Bournemouth | 1 | Dr Cole | Devizes | 0 |
14 | E Atkins | Fareham | 1 | J Crompton | Bradford | 0 |
15 | T Hutchins | Portsmouth | ½ | FE Young | Sarum | ½ |
16 | RE Reade | Portsmouth | 1 | LM Crow | Marlborough | 0 |
17 | F Martin | Portsmouth | 1 | CE May | Marlborough | 0 |
18 | HO Bates | Southampton | 0 | CH Stratton | Warminster | 1 |
Total | 9 | Total | 9 |
Hampshire Player Performance
Although Hampshire played four matches, there were some adjudicated games which I don’t have the results for, which makes the below table slightly inaccurate. JH Blake was the only player to play in all four matches and by his high standards two and half points was not a great result. Frank Elwell scored a win and a draw from his two games, and a number of players won the single game they played in. There were a couple of names which were difficult to determine and may refer to a player under another name.
Individual player performance is detailed below in a sortable table.
Hants Player | Win Percentage | Points Scored | Games Played |
---|---|---|---|
JH Blake | 62.5% | 2.5 | 4 |
FJH Elwell | 75.0% | 1.5 | 2 |
DHH Wassell | 75.0% | 1.5 | 3 |
KC Clayton | 100.0% | 1 | 1 |
RE Reade | 100.0% | 1 | 1 |
FW Clarke | 100.0% | 1 | 1 |
AG Ripley | 100.0% | 1 | 1 |
JS Flower | 100.0% | 1 | 1 |
CE Lloyd | 100.0% | 1 | 1 |
EC Clarke | 100.0% | 1 | 1 |
Dr RC Macdonald | 100.0% | 1 | 1 |
E Atkins | 100.0% | 1 | 1 |
GK Dupree | 100.0% | 1 | 1 |
GR Sloper | 100.0% | 1 | 1 |
F Martin | 50.0% | 1 | 2 |
SD Caws | 50.0% | 1 | 2 |
FA Joyce | 50.0% | 1 | 2 |
TE Haydon | 50.0% | 1 | 2 |
G Wood | 33.3% | 1 | 3 |
R Chipperfield | 50.0% | 0.5 | 1 |
GH Barclay | 50.0% | 0.5 | 1 |
S Leonard | 50.0% | 0.5 | 1 |
JB Elcum | 50.0% | 0.5 | 1 |
T Hutchins | 50.0% | 0.5 | 1 |
L Hewett | 50.0% | 0.5 | 1 |
WF Sandell | 50.0% | 0.5 | 1 |
WR Neve | 50.0% | 0.5 | 1 |
HD Osborn | 50.0% | 0.5 | 1 |
T Crassweller | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
A Watson | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
GJ Beer | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
E Seymour | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
R Targett | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
WJ Turner | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
RH Wadeson | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
HJ Penwill | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
HO Bates | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
WB George | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
GR Barton | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
H Taggett | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
WC Kenny | 0.0% | 0 | 2 |
W Tipper | 0.0% | 0 | 2 |
E Draycott | 0.0% | 0 | 2 |
A Thomson | 0.0% | 0 | 2 |
E Clayton | 0.0% | 0 | 3 |
Summary
This was Hampshire’s worse season since their inception, and they seemed to be having some trouble with players defaulting in matches.
As some background on Hampshire Chess this season the Hampshire Trophy was won by Southampton B who beat Portsmouth A in the final. The Hampshire Trophy only had six entries, with Southampton entering three teams, Portsmouth two and Andover one. A sub committee was created at the AGM to look at amending the rules to attract other clubs to enter.
The Hampshire Chess Officers were unchanged from 1902:
- R Chipperfield – President
- E Draycott – Hon. Secretary and Treasurer
- JH Blake – Match Captain
- FJH Elwell, G Wood – Adjudicator’s
- GR Sloper, JH Blake, E Draycott – SCCU Delegates
Following the 1903 AGM a match was played between Southampton and the visitors (5 players from Portsmouth and 1 from Andover) which Southampton won 4 – 2.
Gallery
A selection of newspaper cuttings on the various matches.
Acknowledgements and Sources
- British Newspaper Archives
- Hampshire Post and Southsea Observer
- Isle of Wight Observer
- Portsmouth Evening News
- Hastings and St Leonards Observer
- Streatham News
- Wiltshire Times and Trowbridge Advertiser
- Hampshire Independent