Hampshire played three county chess matches this season, meeting the same opponents as 1894 / 95, with two matches in the SCCU Shannon South Eastern Division and a friendly one against Wiltshire.
A noticeable change this season was made in the SCCU following issues with the number of games not being completed in the time limit, which led to adjudications. You can see from comments in previous matches that some players did not agree with the adjudicated results and the rule change from 20 to 24 moves per hour was implemented. This did seem to help as the number of games which had to be adjudicated were reduced and the position with regards to the result on the boards was clearer. It does not say if the tea breaks continued, but this may have been a step too far!
- Hampshire v Sussex 23 Nov 1895
- Hampshire v Surrey 15 Feb 1986
- Hampshire v Wiltshire 29 July 1986
- Hampshire v Kent – scratch
- Player Performance
- Summary
- Gallery
- Acknowledgements and Sources
For the record of Hampshire County matches and links to any articles I have written the table on the Hampshire County Chess Matches page will detail these. The Hampshire County Chess History page summaries the leagues Hampshire have played in and the successes Hampshire have achieved. Both of these are available from the menu at the top of the site as well.
Hampshire v Sussex 23 Nov 1895 – Portsmouth
Hampshire were playing in the South East section of the SCCU Shannon Competition, where their opponents for the 1895/96 season were planned to be Sussex, Surrey and Kent.
The first match of the season was against Sussex, which was held in Portsmouth. A very close match resulted with Hampshire winning by one point as reported in the Hampshire Advertiser.
Meanwhile the Hampshire Telegraph had some additional information confirming that chess clocks were now a common occurrence and that the matches had visitors from chess clubs and the local area watching the progress of the games. This may happen to some counties these days, but I don’t remember any visitors at the current Chiltern League matches.
Hampshire winners were Elwell, Sherrard, Crassweller, Joyce, Balshaw and Sloper. Charles Hugh Sherrard who moved to Hampshire this year only played four games for the county from 1895 to 1897, on either board three or four. In 1905 he was joint second in the 2nd British Chess Championship behind Henry Atkins, proving he was a top class player. In 1900 is seems he had moved back to Kent, as was playing for them against Hampshire, which explains why he only played the four games for Hampshire. This is a shame as a player of his strength was a real loss to the county.
Worth noting that his second place at the British Chess Championship in 1905 matched Joseph Blake’s best performance of 1909, when he finished tied with Henry Atkins, but lost the tie-break (so in theory in second place, but this was a better performance).
As to why he did not play again in the British Championship, unfortunately he died in 1906 as detailed on the EDO Ratings website which also estimated his strength between 2300 and 2400. These ratings are only a rough estimate,
Here is a game between these two Hampshire players, from a SCCU tournament held in Salisbury in 1898. The First Class tournament was won by JH Blake and William Ward of London with 7½ points from 10 games. Sherrard finished with 4 points from his 10 games, whilst fellow Hampshire player Francis Elwell scored 5 points.
The Britbase details on the British Championship have a number of his games from this tournament, including a fine finish against William Shoosmith.
One final point on the 1898 Salisbury Tournament was that the 2nd class tournament was won by Louisa Fagan with 9 points from 11 games. This was a great performance, but this tournament also included 17 year old George Thomas and the Isle of Wight Francis Joyce.
The match result below also includes the clubs the players were representing. For Hampshire, Southampton had five players, Portsmouth four, Gosport and Isle of Wight two and Andover, Bournemouth and Southsea one. Being played in Portsmouth would have made it easier for the Isle of Wight players to travel and we have met Joyce and Daws before in Hampshire and Isle of Wight matches.
Sussex as normal had the large representation from Brighton with eight players whilst Lodsworth has two (brothers?) and there were one each from Hastings, Lewes, Horsham and Hurst with two not detailed.
Board | Hampshire | Club | Hants Result | Sussex | Club | Sussex Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JH Blake | Southampton | ½ | A Emery | Brighton | ½ |
2 | FJH Elwell | Southampton | 1 | HW Butler | Brighton | 0 |
3 | CH Sherrard | Gosport | 1 | HE Dobell | Hastings | 0 |
4 | WJ Evans | Portsmouth | 0 | HW Shoosmith | Brighton | 1 |
5 | WC Kenny | Southampton | 0 | E Macdonald | Brighton | 1 |
6 | A Asher | Southampton | 0 | FW Comber | Brighton | 1 |
7 | HD Osborn | Gosport | 0 | JW Bridger | Lodsworth | 1 |
8 | T Crassweller | Portsmouth | 1 | W Bridger | Lodsworth | 0 |
9 | E Clayton | Portsmouth | ½ | J Chandler | Lewes | ½ |
10 | A Thomas | Bournemouth | ½ | EJ Reed | Hurst | ½ |
11 | HW Daws | IOW | 0 | HH Blackstock | Brighton | 1 |
12 | FA Joyce | IOW | 1 | Col Kensington | Brighton | 0 |
13 | G Deal | Portsmouth | ½ | HC Hunt | Horsham | ½ |
14 | PT Balshaw | Southsea | 1 | JFV Isaac | Brighton | 0 |
15 | GR Sloper | Southampton | 1 | FE Purchase | 0 | |
16 | E Clarke | Andover | ½ | P Johnson | ½ | |
Total | 8½ | Total | 7½ |
Hampshire v Surrey – 15 Feb 1896 – Basingstoke
Hampshire second match was against Surrey, and although they improved on their heavy loss from the previous season, Surrey were still comfortable 10 – 6 winners. It was reported that the likely winner of this match would probably be the ultimate champions for the year. This proved to be true, as Surrey were the 1895/96 Shannon Champions.
Hampshire winners were Blake, Elwell, Sloper and Clarke. Hampshire did better this year in persuading the Portsmouth contingent to play, with at least three playing (Crassweller, Clayton and Wheatstone).
At first glance the Hampshire team looked as strong as the one against Sussex with Crassweller and Clayton playing on the same boards in both matches. But lower down Sloper was on board 11 this time compared to board 15 against Sussex, and in general I think the Hampshire team were weaker in this match, specifically towards the tail.
Board | Hampshire | Hants Result | Surrey | Surrey Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JH Blake | 1 | A Howell | 0 |
2 | E Seymour | 0 | GE Wainwright | 1 |
3 | FJH Elwell | 1 | JH Taylor | 0 |
4 | CH Sherrard | 0 | GA Hooke | 1 |
5 | S Clarke | 0 | HH Cole | 1 |
6 | A Asher | ½ | WT Ingoldshy | ½ |
7 | HD Osborn | 0 | LP Rees | 1 |
8 | T Crassweller | ½ | WE Vyse | ½ |
9 | E Clayton | ½ | FN Braund | ½ |
10 | H Gagen | 0 | WC Bowyer | 1 |
11 | GR Sloper | 1 | HS Leonard | 0 |
12 | AW Wheatstone | 0 | Evan Cresswell | 1 |
13 | GH Barclay | ½ | B McLeod | ½ |
14 | PEJ Talbot | 0 | AW Lemon | 1 |
15 | H Seymour | 0 | SB Baxter | 1 |
16 | E Clarke | 1 | HS Ward | 0 |
Total | 6 | Total | 10 |
The Nottinghamshire Guardian published the Blake – Howell game which was annotated by Gunsberg (which I presume was Isidor Gunsberg.
Hampshire v Wiltshire – 29 July 1896 – Salisbury
The final match of the season was against Wiltshire with the annual friendly match played at Salisbury. The venue this time was the residence of one of the Salisbury’s players (WH Jackson), although his kindness was not paid in kind, as the Isle of Wight player Frank Joyce defeated him in their game.
The report in the Southern Echo confirmed that I have the correct amount of matches between the counties, with four matches mentioned as the total played at this time. Hampshire had won two, drawn one and lost one of the matches.
Hampshire won the match 10 – 6 and this year there were no adjournments, although if the games were played at the 20 or 24 moves per hour is not known. The Hampshire winners were Blake, Elwell, Thomson, Joyce, Balshaw, Wheatstone and Draycott.
Board | Hampshire | Hants Result | Wiltshire | Wiltshire Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JH Blake | 1 | Colonel Law | 0 |
2 | FJH Elwell | 1 | HJ King | 0 |
3 | HD Osborn | ½ | Revd JF Welsh | ½ |
4 | T Crassweller | ½ | A Schomberg | ½ |
5 | A Asher | 0 | F Sutton | 1 |
6 | WC Kenny | ½ | CJ Woodrow | ½ |
7 | E Clayton | ½ | PT Mussell | ½ |
8 | A Thomson | 1 | A Watson | 0 |
9 | GH Barclay | ½ | O Leake | ½ |
10 | FA Joyce | 1 | WH Jackson | 0 |
11 | EC Clarke | 0 | T Patton | 1 |
12 | WB George | 0 | AF Sheehy | 1 |
13 | PT Balshaw | 1 | HW Beaven | 0 |
14 | AW Wheatstone | 1 | C Adams | 0 |
15 | S Leonard | ½ | JW Clark | ½ |
16 | E Draycott | 1 | A Goodere | 0 |
Total | 10 | Total | 6 |
Hampshire v Kent – Scratch
The match against Kent only seems to have been played when the result would affect who would progress out of the South Easter division. As Hampshire could not qualify for the final stages this season the match was not played.
Hampshire Player Performance
Three matches were played in 1895/96.
Hampshire’s top players JH Blake and FJH Elwell did very well this season, only dropping half a point between them. Joseph Blake played his three games on top board, whilst Francis Elwell was on board two twice and board three once.
Sloper, Balwhaw and Joyce all played one game less, but all managed to win both their games, whilst Crasweller and Clarke were also high scorers.
Hants Player | Win Percentage | Points Scored | Games Played |
---|---|---|---|
FJH Elwell | 100.0% | 3 | 3 |
JH Blake | 83.3% | 2.5 | 3 |
GR Sloper | 100.0% | 2 | 2 |
PT Balshaw | 100.0% | 2 | 2 |
FA Joyce | 100.0% | 2 | 2 |
T Crassweller | 66.7% | 2 | 3 |
E Clarke | 75.0% | 1.5 | 2 |
E Clayton | 50.0% | 1.5 | 3 |
E Draycott | 100.0% | 1 | 1 |
A Thomson | 100.0% | 1 | 1 |
CH Sherrard | 50.0% | 1 | 2 |
AW Wheatstone | 50.0% | 1 | 2 |
GH Barclay | 50.0% | 1 | 2 |
S Leonard | 50.0% | 0.5 | 1 |
G Deal | 50.0% | 0.5 | 1 |
A Thomas | 50.0% | 0.5 | 1 |
WC Kenny | 25.0% | 0.5 | 2 |
HD Osborn | 16.7% | 0.5 | 3 |
A Asher | 16.7% | 0.5 | 3 |
HW Daws | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
EC Clarke | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
H Seymour | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
H Gagen | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
WB George | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
E Seymour | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
WJ Evans | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
S Clarke | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
PEJ Talbot | 0.0% | 0 | 1 |
Summary
It was a better season for Hampshire with two wins and one loss against the eventual Champions, but the top places remained just out of reach. The Hampshire Chess Association was continuing to grow though, with the introduction of the Hampshire League. This league would see the Portsmouth and Southampton Chess Clubs dominate for a number of years, although Basingstoke also had early successes.
Although a number of the players who represented the Hampshire Chess team played in the Hampshire League, this also gave club players who were not strong enough to represent Hampshire an opportunity to play competitively outside of their club tournaments.
Gallery
A selection of newspaper cuttings on the various matches.
Acknowledgements and Sources
- British Newspaper Archives
- Hampshire Advertiser
- Hampshire Telegraph
- Southern Echo
- Newcastle Courant
- Swindon Advertiser and North Wilts Chronicle
- Britbase
- British Chess News
- Edo Historical Chess Rating
1 thought on “Hampshire County Matches 1895 / 96”