Hampshire did not play and County Matches in 1890 but looking over the season as we now play (Sept 1890 to August 1891) they played and won two matches against Sussex. These were completed following the formation of the Hampshire Chess Association in 1890,
For the record of Hampshire County matches and links to any articles I have written the table on the Hampshire County Chess Matches page will detail these. The Hampshire County Chess History page summaries the leagues Hampshire have played in and the successes Hampshire have achieved. Both of these are available from the menu at the top of the site as well.
Hampshire – Sussex 17 Jan 1891 – Chichester
After not playing a County chess match for two years Hampshire played Sussex in January 1891. Following Hampshire’s 9½ – 6½ win the Isle of Wight Observer were not shy in stating Hampshire’s position as the premier chess county on the south coast. I am not convinced this was correct, but Hampshire certainly performed well in both their matches against Sussex this year.
CHESS MATCH. Hampshire v. Sussex. The newly formed Hampshire Chess Association must be congratulated on its first victory for three reasons : First, because all the members of the Hampshire team appointed to play attended, notwithstanding the long cold journey most of them undertook by steamboat and railway; secondly, because Sussex has not been defeated for the last three years, having in turn beaten Hants, Kent, Surrey, and Yorkshire (the latter a match by correspondence); thirdly, because Hampshire can now fairly lay claim to the title of premier chess county on the south coast.
Isle of Wight Observer – Saturday 24 January 1891
The strength of the Hampshire team is largely due to the indefatigable efforts of Mr JH Blake, of Southampton, who is considered by the London professionals to be the strongest amateur in England.
The match took place at Hardham’s Restaurant, East-street, Chichester, on Saturday afternoon at three o’clock. The Presidents of both the Hampshire and Sussex Associations were present. Several of the Hampshire team did not play up to their usual good form owing to indisposition.
Board | Hampshire | Colour | Hants Result | Sussex | Colour | Sussex Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JH Blake | Black | 1 | HW Butler | White | 0 |
2 | Lieut CH Chepmell | White | 0 | WV Wilson | Black | 1 |
3 | T Crassweller | Black | 1 | Erskine | White | 0 |
4 | WC Kenny | White | 1 | Meal | Black | 0 |
5 | F Budden | Black | ½ | Macdonald | White | ½ |
6 | GR Sloper | White | 0 | Oxley | Black | 1 |
7 | FJH Elwell | Black | 1 | G Humphreys | White | 0 |
8 | E Clayton | White | 1 | Pritchard | Black | 0 |
9 | G Deal | Black | 0 | JV Elsden | White | 1 |
10 | R Chipperfield | White | 0 | JW Bridger | Black | 1 |
11 | Revd E Wells | Black | 1 | A Emery | White | 0 |
12 | Dr H de Fonmartin | White | ½ | Revd Wright | Black | ½ |
13 | PJ Dancer | Black | 0 | Chandler | White | 1 |
14 | HD Osborn | White | 1 | Penfold | Black | 0 |
15 | W Bowyer | Black | 1 | H Nash | White | 0 |
16 | FA Joyce | White | ½ | Dr Graham Storrington | Black | ½ |
Total | 9½ | Total | 6½ |
Hampshire v Sussex – 30 May 1891 – Portsmouth
The Portsmouth Evening News had a comprehensive report which I detail below. Their opinion was that the 7 – 5 win would have been larger if Sussex had played the agreed 16 board match, rather than the 12 board match. Whether this is true or not is hard to say, but it was good to see that Mr Osborne did not have a wasted journey from the Isle of Wight to play.
The report in the paper included details on each game.
CHESS MATCH. HAMPSHIRE V. SUSSEX. ANOTHER VICTORY FOR HAMPSHIRE. The match Burghard’s Hotel, Commercial road, Portsmouth, on Saturday last, leaves no doubt to the leading chess county on the south coast. Sussex, with her large and well-organised Association, backed up as it is with a chess journal, certainly has many advantages over Hampshire, whose Association has been existence but eight months.
Portsmouth Evening News – Monday 01 June 1891
Had Sussex played 16 a-side, according to arrangement, her defeat would, have been much greater. Thus Dr Foumartin, of Portsmouth, a brilliant player, generously stood out for Mr. Osborne, of Ryde, who had travelled specially from London in order to play. Mr. Osborne was to have played number 16, which position he would have doubtless won his game.
On board 1. Mr JH Blake’s game with Mr. Wilson was adjudicated at 8 pm as a draw, although Mr. Blake had the advantage of a pawn. Both gentlemen played with considerable ability.
Board 2.—Lieutenant Chepmell played a brilliant and faultless game with Mr. Butler. The latter had the opening move and won easily.
Board 3. —Mr. Crassweller finished up hard, contested game with two pawns to the good, and won.
Board 4.—Mr. Elwell, the rising young player of Southampton, managed to secure a draw, although he was a pawn to the bad.
Board 5.—Mr. Raymond after two hours excellent play made a slip, Mr. Erskine cleverly took advantage of it and secured a win.
Board 6.—Mr. Kenny, of Southampton, as usual, won brilliantly.
Board 7.—Mr. Budden secured a masterly position at the start, from which he was never wholly dislodged, although his opponent played well.
Board 8. —Mr. E. Clayton has played four times for his county, winning 3½ out of 4. His game, however, against Mr J Bridger was adjudicated as a draw. Mr. Bridger played a brilliant Ruy Lopez attack, To which Mr Clayton nearly succumbed, he having pawn to the bad.
Board 9.—Mr. Chipperfield’s game with Mr. Malden was even throughout.
Board 10.—The Rev E Wells, after a very even game, left a knight en prise, which Mr Dobel immediately captured, and the former resigned.
Board 11. Mr. Curtis had decidedly the worst of the opening game with Mr. Mussabini, but a series of excellent combinations regained ground, and won one of the best games in the match.
Board 12. —Mr. Osborn played an even game, for three hours, but eventually Mr Arnold secured a winning position, and at eight p.m. Adjudicators awarded the game to Mr. Arnold.
Thus Hampshire has now won three matches and Sussex one.
Board | Hampshire | Hants Result | Sussex | Sussex Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | JH Blake | ½ | WV Wilson | ½ |
2 | Lieut CH Chepmell | 1 | HW Butler | 0 |
3 | T Crassweller | 1 | WR Andrews | 0 |
4 | FJH Elwell | ½ | W Mead | ½ |
5 | EL Raymond | 0 | Erskine | 1 |
6 | WC Kenny | 1 | W Bridger | 0 |
7 | F Budden | 1 | J Chandler | 0 |
8 | E Clayton | ½ | JW Bridger | ½ |
9 | R Chipperfield | ½ | Major HC Malden | ½ |
10 | Revd E Wells | 0 | HE Dobell | 1 |
11 | WH Curtis | 1 | Mussabini | 0 |
12 | HD Osborn | 0 | P Arnold | 1 |
Total | 7 | Total | 5 |
Gallery
Click on the pictures to open in full screen.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/304ad/304ade98843abd5ad290d91392ee234a905dd7c7" alt="Sussex Match Isle of Wight Observer - Saturday 24 January 1891"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ce49/8ce49a4082d389e65003c4acc635f6e965187439" alt="Sussex Match Portsmouth Evening News - Monday 01 June 1891"
Acknowledgements and Sources
- British Newspaper Archives
- Portsmouth Evening News
- Isle of Wight Observer